True or False Pope?

Posted by on Mar 5, 2016 in Pope Michael | 0 comments

I am devoting a whole section to a refutation of this heretical work.  It is diabolical in how it is presented.  As I am reading, I am finding they pick and choose.  First they pick and choose which representative of sedevacantism to refute.  I am presuming they are taking the argument easiest to refute, and I must admit in some cases they are correct in their refutation.  Also they are picking and choosing which theologian(s) to quote.  It is obvious they have done a lot of research.  It is unfortunate they have not considered all of the evidence. Many of their arguments do not present enough evidence to reach certitude.

Ironically some of the arguments they use against Sedevacantism can also be used against the Society of Saint Pius X, which they are apparently affiliated with.

I have noticed that there are some points I am going to have to go back in to and consider more fully, so I expect to be spending time in doctrine.
They even use things that are on the Index of Prohibited books.
They are using sources that the Sedevacantists will not accept, such as the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the 1983 Code of Canon Law.

Next they are ignoring things, which the Society of Saint Pius X has published, which help refute their arguments.
And I am only on page 125, although I have read the section on Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio.
This is a work in progress, and I don’t expect it to be completed before Easter.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *